Outpost Users Support Forum  
Outpost User Operated Support Forum
Agnitum Outpost Pro Release (OP, OSS, AV): 7.0.3.3392 [24-AUG-2010]
www.agnitum.com

Go Back   Outpost Users Support Forum > Agnitum's User Feedback

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-18-2006, 03:37 AM
Mikhail's Avatar
Mikhail Mikhail is offline
Agnitum Ltd.
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 4,174
Kernel mode hooks or user mode hooks – what’s best for the firewall

David Matousek, an independent security analyst, has released a new tool called FPR to test the ability of firewalls to protect against data theft techniques. The idea behind this tool is to undo changes in Windows made by firewalls before launching a leaktest.

While Outpost Firewall Pro version 4.0 (971.584.079) has passed all previously-available leaktests, it was unable to defeat the hacking technique used in FPR tool – but we still placed 5th of the 21 firewalls tested. Every instance like this is a reminder that we must constantly be on our guard against new and dangerous hacking techniques – what is developed in a lab one day may be in the wild the next day. So we have updated Outpost’s Anti-Leak module to block this new potential vulnerability before it can be used in any malware. This update is in beta now and will be available to all licensed Outpost Firewall Pro v4 users very soon.

In his test result analyses, Matousek claims that Agnitum uses user mode hooks instead of kernel mode hooks, and is therefore cheating. Since this claim is absolutely untrue, we felt it was important for us to explain what is going on here.

“User mode hooks” is a term referring to an interception technique used by security software against viruses, spyware, Trojans and other malware. User mode hooks cannot provide absolute 100% protection – there are ways to bypass them as was done by the FPR tool against Outpost.

“Kernel mode hooks” refers to another method of interception which creates a barrier at a lower system level. What Mr. Matousek omits to mention is that kernel mode hooks can also be bypassed, so this approach cannot provide 100% protection either.

The relative merits of both approaches are discussed in more detail in a new Agnitum TechNote, available below.

So, what this means is that security software developers cannot rely solely on only one technique to protect end users from malware. We don’t agree that the “kernel mode hooks” approach is better than the “user mode hooks” approach; it is our belief that a blend of the two techniques is the most effective way to deliver robust firewall protection.

This is what we are doing in Outpost Firewall Pro and this is why we believe our approach is more flexible and provides better real-world security for our customers. To learn more about Agnitum’s approach to User Mode and Kernel Mode security, read attached TechNote
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Kernel mode hooks or user mode hooks.pdf (49.7 KB, 157 views)
__________________
http://agnitumblog.blogspot.com
Meet the people behind the products.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outpost 4 analysis by Matousec Dwarden Outpost Firewall General Discussions, Support, and Troubleshooting 51 02-17-2007 03:40 AM
Home Firewall Path bringlerII Computer Help 3 11-10-2006 11:41 AM
Firewall Mode and Policy Settings chrisretusn Outpost Firewall General Discussions, Support, and Troubleshooting 3 08-30-2004 05:10 PM
New Sygate Pro Beta out WizzOzz Retired Threads 8 12-24-2001 09:52 PM


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 07:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.