Outpost Users Support Forum  
Outpost User Operated Support Forum
Agnitum Outpost Pro Release (OP, OSS, AV): 7.0.2.3377 [23-JUL-2010]
www.agnitum.com

Go Back   Outpost Users Support Forum > Agnitum Outpost Security Suite / Outpost Firewall/Outpost Antivirus > 64 bit - Agnitum Outpost Outpost Security Suite, Outpost Firewall, Outpost Antivirus

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-09-2010, 12:52 AM
Escalader's Avatar
Escalader Escalader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 319
SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Here is a log entry from W7 64 bit with OP FW Pro 2009 6.7.3.3058.

Before asking our vendor I would appreciate it if any body else sees a similar entry. ie in/out bytes at summary level but none at detail level.

Comments as always welcome!
Attached Images
File Type: png SVCHOST_EXE_936_log.png (182.2 KB, 13 views)
__________________
Best Regards!

.... there is always time to do it over, but never enough to do it right the first time....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2010, 02:00 AM
burebista's Avatar
burebista burebista is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Romania
Posts: 51
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Yep. I have more entries with 0 traffic in detail.
Attached Images
File Type: png op.png (144.7 KB, 11 views)
__________________
If it ain't broke... fix it until it is.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:16 AM
Manny Carvalho's Avatar
Manny Carvalho Manny Carvalho is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 10,421
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

The used ports section means that an application has opened a port and is listening for traffic. There's no connection since the bytes are at zero.

The PID of 936 is not relevant since it's an assigned ID number and as you see other sessions of svchost have different PIDs. Svchost hosts quite a few processes so looking at the port number is the way to try and determine what process has that port [49153] open. Process Explorer may be of help trying to determine what port that is but Win 7 is a little more difficult to figure these things out.

Port 49153 belong to the private/ephemeral ports that get randomaly assigned. Try turning off software that you may have running and see if that port gets closed. It's not a real problem as OP will warn you if a new connection is attempted if your svchost rules are properly made.
__________________
Regards,
Manny Carvalho
MS-MVP Windows since 2002
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:41 AM
Escalader's Avatar
Escalader Escalader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny Carvalho View Post
The used ports section means that an application has opened a port and is listening for traffic. There's no connection since the bytes are at zero.

The PID of 936 is not relevant since it's an assigned ID number and as you see other sessions of svchost have different PIDs. Svchost hosts quite a few processes so looking at the port number is the way to try and determine what process has that port [49153] open. Process Explorer may be of help trying to determine what port that is but Win 7 is a little more difficult to figure these things out.

Port 49153 belong to the private/ephemeral ports that get randomaly assigned. Try turning off software that you may have running and see if that port gets closed. It's not a real problem as OP will warn you if a new connection is attempted if your svchost rules are properly made.

Hi Manny:

My question is poorly phrased I guess. I'm unconcerned about pid numbers.

I simply wanted to know how I have data in and out at summary level but looking at the detail level all I see is zeros. Normal summary/ detail reports balance. IE the sum of the detail lines equals the summary.

SVCHOST rules do concern me and have alway confused me.

I set rules up on a completely different new application using learning mode for 5 minutes only to find all sorts of new SVCHOST rules showing up via the presets. I must be doing something wrong or suffering rule burn out. But it is very frustrating to keep having to go back and see what damage learning mode did to rules I thought I was done with.

Never mind...
__________________
Best Regards!

.... there is always time to do it over, but never enough to do it right the first time....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:51 AM
Manny Carvalho's Avatar
Manny Carvalho Manny Carvalho is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 10,421
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Quote:
Originally Posted by Escalader View Post
Hi Manny:

My question is poorly phrased I guess. I'm unconcerned about pid numbers.

I simply wanted to know how I have data in and out at summary level but looking at the detail level all I see is zeros. Normal summary/ detail reports balance. IE the sum of the detail lines equals the summary.
Got you. Makes no sense to me either. Ask Agnitum and let us know the response.

Quote:
SVCHOST rules do concern me and have alway confused me.

I set rules up on a completely different new application using learning mode for 5 minutes only to find all sorts of new SVCHOST rules showing up via the presets. I must be doing something wrong or suffering rule burn out. But it is very frustrating to keep having to go back and see what damage learning mode did to rules I thought I was done with.

Never mind...
Svchost rules can be confusing particularly if you try to make a tight configuration. If you do try to make your own rules then you can't use the learning mode. The point of auto-learn is to make things easy but reasonably secure. That means allowing more things than a tight configuration would. The two aren't compatible and will continue to frustrate you if you try both. If you want to make a tight configuration as per our FAQ then you got to start and continue manually. There's simply no easy way to get a tight configuration. There's nothing automatic about it - no presets, no auto anything, nothing. Turn it all off. It's all hard work.
__________________
Regards,
Manny Carvalho
MS-MVP Windows since 2002

Last edited by Manny Carvalho; 02-09-2010 at 09:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2010, 12:27 AM
Escalader's Avatar
Escalader Escalader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny Carvalho View Post
Got you. Makes no sense to me either. Ask Agnitum and let us know the response.

Svchost rules can be confusing particularly if you try to make a tight configuration. If you do try to make your own rules then you can't use the learning mode. The point of auto-learn is to make things easy but reasonably secure. That means allowing more things than a tight configuration would. The two aren't compatible and will continue to frustrate you if you try both. If you want to make a tight configuration as per our FAQ then you got to start and continue manually. There's simply no easy way to get a tight configuration. There's nothing automatic about it - no presets, no auto anything, nothing. Turn it all off. It's all hard work.

Hi Manny:

on the in/out summary I will ask the vendor and report back

on the rules I will follow the guide you gave in the post, from this point forward I'll just drive the car with manual transmission.

Maybe some day some nice person will provide a tight rule starter set for OP. Users could download it as a saved configuration file.
__________________
Best Regards!

.... there is always time to do it over, but never enough to do it right the first time....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2010, 12:57 AM
Escalader's Avatar
Escalader Escalader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Re: SVCHOST.EXE.936 in/out summary only

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny Carvalho View Post
Got you. Makes no sense to me either. Ask Agnitum and let us know the response.

Svchost rules can be confusing particularly if you try to make a tight configuration. If you do try to make your own rules then you can't use the learning mode. The point of auto-learn is to make things easy but reasonably secure. That means allowing more things than a tight configuration would. The two aren't compatible and will continue to frustrate you if you try both. If you want to make a tight configuration as per our FAQ then you got to start and continue manually. There's simply no easy way to get a tight configuration. There's nothing automatic about it - no presets, no auto anything, nothing. Turn it all off. It's all hard work.
Hello Thread:

I did hear back from the vendor. All they said was take and send the usual zip log files so they can see what is going on in my PC. Assumption is that I have done something wrong.

I have not done that, since all they have to do is look at their own versions.

I'm done with this one. They will either fix it or they won't.
__________________
Best Regards!

.... there is always time to do it over, but never enough to do it right the first time....

Last edited by Escalader; 02-17-2010 at 12:58 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blocking in/out with 1 rule, same as 2 rules? DebP Outpost Firewall General Discussions, Support, and Troubleshooting 3 12-13-2007 10:57 AM


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.